what are the pros and cons of land acquisition bill ?

@ Syed Pasha,

According to me, Return of unutilised land: in line with the Act 2013, if the land remains unutilised for 5 years, then it has to be came to the owner. however in line with the ordinance the amount once that unutilised land has to be came are 5 years, or any amount specific at the time of putting in place the project, whichever is later.

Time frame: The ordinance states that if the possession of acquired land underneath Act 1984 isn't taken for reasons, then the new law are applied.

@ Syed,

Accordig to source, Word 'private company' replaced with 'private entity': whereas the Act 2013 explicit that the land will be nonheritable for private company, the ordinance replaced it with private entity. A personal entity is Associate in Nursing entity aside from a government entity, and will embody a proprietary, partnership, company, corporation, non-profit organisation, or different entity underneath the other law.

Hi Guys,
According to me, here area unit positive clauses of the new Land Acquisition modification Bill:
1) The existing Act unbroken thirteen most often used acts for Land Acquisition for Central Government projects out of the compass. These acts area unit applicable for national highways, metro rail, energy projects, electricity connected comes, etc. this amendments bring all those exempted from the thirteen acts beneath the compass of this Act for the aim of compensation, rehabilitation and conveyance. Therefore, the modification advantages farmers and affected families.

2) The planned changes within the Land Acquisition Act would enable a quick track method for defence and defence production, rural infrastructure together with electrification, reasonable housing, industrial corridors and infrastructure comes together with comes haunted beneath Public non-public Partnership mode wherever possession of the land continues to be unconditional with the govt.

3) As per the changes brought within the Ordinance, multi-crop irrigated plot also can be aquired for functions like national security, defence, rural infrastructure together with electrification, industrial corridors and building social infrastructure.

Hi Guys,
Continuing my previous statement , here are some of disadvantages/ negative clauses of this bill ,as per my knowledge:-

1) The first Land Acquisition Act, 2013 had a consent clause for acquiring land – industrial corridors, Public private Partnership projects, rural infrastructure, affordable housing and defence. However when the central government modified, it exempted these 5 classes from the rule of acquitting land within the Bill tabled on February 24.

2) Social assessment that was necessary before acquitting land has conjointly been exempted within the Bill tabled within the Lok Sabha.

3) As per the present law, land are given back to the farmer if it remains unused for 5 years. The projected change says the land are came back providing the desired project on the land fails to complete the point in time.

4) Bureaucrats are admonished if found guilty of violating any clause of the present Land Act. However, the new clause makes government sanction necessary to prosecute civil servants.

The Land Acquisition change Act, 2015 is presently making lots of problem in Parliament with the Lok Sabha session being adjourned for a similar on February twenty four. With each opposition and ruling parties equally holding their leashes tight on the Land Bill, solely time can tell if the amendments within the Land Acquisition Act are passed or not and whether or not they are actually helpful.

@ Syed Pasha,

As per current news, before the amendments to the Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation transferral Act 2013 get force, the Sabarmati Riverfront Development Corporation restricted (SRFDCL) is rushing up land acquisition that was unfinished for widening the project boundary on each the banks of the watercourse. If the new amendments area unit enacted, SRFDCL can need to pay Brobdingnagian compensations in terms of prevailing industrial land rates instead of paying the Jantri rates. variety of plot house owners on the west and therefore the east banks would see deductions of their plots for this purpose.

@ Mr Pasha,

Some personal plots on the watercourse banks fall among the projected road, the policy document states. And to require over the possession of the land from house owners, SRFDCL has offered 2 choices to them — the good thing about settled space and FSI of land nonheritable shall lean on the remaining plot of land; and a few a part of the plot goes into the project boundary and therefore the rest allotted to the owner. In such cases, when deducting the residual land for project boundary, on the remaining half the owner would get advantages of settled and FSI in subtracted plot.

@ Syed Pasha,

For house owners/buyers who have logged legal cases against AMC and SRFDCL, a brand new formula has been scripted . First, to pay the quantity as per jantri through mutual agreement between owner and SRFDCL. A second possibility is to offer the owner the good thing about prevailing FSI of the realm of the land that goes for project boundary. This further FSI assigned are often employed by owner as transfer of development rights (TDR) inside AMC space and might even sell it to a builder.