What are the key high lights of this land acquisition bill ?

Q: How is this land acquisition bill different from 2013 land acquisition bill ?

Tushar Sinha, Delhi-NCR

10th March 2015

Real estate News in Delhi

delhi real estate

yamuna expressway authority residential plots

land acquisition bill

delhi land acquistion

financial planning

india real estate market

land reforms

social infrastructure projects

lok sabha

rajya sabha

delhi land acquisition act 2013

land acquisition act 2014

land acquisition bill 2015

Follow Discussion

Also see discussions for

Delhi Real estate News Real estate News in Delhi

Replies (36)

Hey Guys,
According to Finance Minister, it is not a setback. It is set forward. Rather than involve ourselves in political deadlock and remain parked in a traffic jam situation, we should take the possible route, which has lesser political cost, provide greater freedom to the states... and states who want to get benefit out of it, get the benefit out of it.

Raj Roy, Delhi

9th September 2015

Comment

Last week, the government had favored an order to involve 13 central acts like national highway and railways acts to expand benefits to those whose plot is acquired under the land law. Replying to queries on GST bill, which is held up in Rajya Sabha, the minister told that he was in touch with the Congress party.

Veena K,

10th September 2015

Hi Guys,
As per the latest news, the constitution amendment bill to roll out GST, a new indirect tax control, has been passed by Lok Sabha, but is hold in the Upper House where the government does not have majority. One way or another, this bill will help both builders & buyers. People should know clearly about this bill.

Bulbul Verma,

11th September 2015

Hi,
I heard from news that, Land Acquisition Bill that deals with the developers who have termed the center's move to let the land acquisition bill fall through as "disastrous". According to them the decision will affect infrastructure projects such as the coastal road, the nuclear power project at Jaitapur and other industrial projects across the state. Even national projects such as the industrial corridor will face difficulties. Land acquisition for railways, airports and power plants will be difficult.

Devaan Das, Gurgaon

9th September 2015

Comment

The Builders are more worried than the common man. Why are they so concerned with this bill? They have to build only on what they can, that is their concern. If they do their work sincerely and honestly, how does the bill affect them.

manider kumar, Gurgaon

9th September 2015

Guys,
Yesterday, Finance Minister replied back to the developers saying, let the land acquisition ordinance to lapse is not a problem for the government and the different route assumed by the Centre will provide greater flexibility to the states to deal with the issue.

Raj Roy, Delhi

9th September 2015

Even honorable Prime Minister Mr Narendra Modi had announced yesterday that the government will not republish the controversial ordinance on Land Acquisition that lapses on Monday and declared eagerness to add any suggestion in the bill, which is pending in Rajya Sabha.

Devaan Das, Gurgaon

9th September 2015

Do you know guys what social activist Medha Patkar told against the Modi Govt? As per her, a new kind of conspiracy in getting the land bill promoted, projected and passed from states to the Centre as it is in the existing list. But people's movements are determined to fight the law at state level.

Nikhil Agarwal, Delhi

28th July 2015

Comment

According to latest news, the committee has 13 members who are opposed to, while 11 are in favour of proposed amendments. So, the votes of rest 6 members, who are mostly regional party leaders, matter more. So, they need to pressurize them to protect their rights.

Sujan Mitra,

29th July 2015

I don't understand why are they playing such kind of game in the parliament. Have they ever experience the beggar's life or they ever plough the field in sunny day or they ever harvest the crops? If not.....then how can they say that they are with the farmers? I think BJP Govt has the majority in the parliament so they don't need to ask and should stamp the bill in the next session of the parliament.

Bulbul Verma,

30th July 2015

As per the current news, The Congress leader also accused the Centre of running away from its administrative and moral responsibility. JPC members and MPs Jairam Ramesh also admitted that he was not completely satisfied with the 2013 Land Acquisition Act brought by the previous UPA government, but added that he had to find a middle path being a cabinet minister then.

Kalki K,

31st July 2015

As per sources, Md. Salim Of CPI (M) asked farmers to force their respective MPs to take the right attitude so as to make sure government changes its stand on the bill. As per Md.Salim farmers are going to feel cheated, if they rely on Parliament members. So, put pressure on their respective Parliamentarians to make government to change its approach.

Rituraj,

1st August 2015

Many farmers from locations like Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan & Tamil Nadu, Haryana,Maharashtra as well as similar other states from different locations suggested their views amid the meeting. As per the sources, the Tamil Nadu leader however showed dissatisfaction at not many JPC members appeared for the hearing.

Mritunjoy Deb,

2nd August 2015

Hi all,
As per the latest new, farmers and activists on Friday, 24th of July,2015 demanded for withdrawal of the NDA government's Land Acquisition law. At a public hearing organized by Bhumi Adhikar Andolan, a union of agricultural worker, the land bill opposer, which included activist Medha Patkar, JPC members and MPs Jairam Ramesh of Congress and Mohammad Salim of CPI(M), also accused the Narendra Modi government of playing a new kind of conspiracy by getting the bill passed from the states.

Arpit, Delhi-NCR

28th July 2015

Comment

Hello Veena,
That is why they are minister. In India if you are doing good for your nation or the people of the nation the opponent will take it in a different way. It show their negativity during the ruling period. They will never do good nor they can see others to do good.

Raj Roy, Delhi

28th July 2015

Jairam Ramesh of congress advised farmers to put pressure on 6 members of the panel whose votes are crucial in deciding conclusion of the panel report. They have failed in their duties and now they are putting pressure on others to stay away with it. it shows their duty toward the nation. And we people vote such kind of people to act for us.

Jeet Bhaskar, Delhi

28th July 2015

Hi Dharmaja,
As per opposer or opposition party , they want withdrawal of the bill to secure land rights for farmer. I want to ask them that they have given 10 years of long time.....what were they doing? Why didn't they pass the bill in their ruling which can help the farmers? Why now?

Praveen P, Delhi

28th July 2015

Hey Akash,

As I would see it, the due date of the joint house committee on land acquisition bill has been stretched out by a week to present its report as the huge part of the members have been squeezing for expanding the time span in light of the fact that they need to have more witnesses and partners inspected, given the significance of the bill.

shaina,

30th June 2015

Comment

@ Mr Akash Kanojia,
As indicated by a few people, even after the government stands to lose one week in the three-week session, further expansions to the board can't be discounted. After all the Congress & other Opposition parties in the panel have been looking for one-month expansion to the committee, one can't preclude the members squeezing for another expansions.

Veena K,

1st July 2015

@ Akash,

The committee is directed by BJP's SS Ahluwalia and NDA has greater part in the panel. On Monday it was the turn of many vice chancellors of agriculture colleges to dismiss before the board, some of them, especially Mangala Rai of GB Pant University vocally contradicting the bill. As of now RSS- subsidiary Bharatiya Kisan Sangh has registered its restriction to the bill before the panel.

Sujan Mitra,

2nd July 2015

Hi Mr Akash Kanojia,

According to sources, this implies the government will now have a window of only a fortnight to get the report submitted in time for being taken up amid the monsoon session, provided the members from the panel board don't press for further expansions. The investors as well as industry are anxiously anticipating the passage of the bill.

Tushar Surendren, Delhi

30th June 2015

Comment

Hey Guys,
I came to know from latest news that the deadline of land bill panel term extended to July 28. The investors as well as industries are eagerly waiting for bill passage. Kindly discuss about it.

Akash Kanojia, Delhi

30th June 2015

Comment

Hey Akash,
As per the current news, the govt's. arrangement to get the joint house board to process the combative land acquisition bill as well as submit its report about the opening day of monsoon session of Parliament on July 21 confronts a new obstacle. Bowing to requests from the Opposition party members, the board's stipulations were on Monday reached out by a week to July 28.

Raj Roy, Delhi

30th June 2015

Hey Vishal,
According to Vijay Yadav, vice-chairman of GDA said that, effort on making land available to the DMRC is under path and starting now we have obtained 18,563.96 square meters of land against 22,779.81 square meters needed. It won't take much long time to finish. It is one of the most awaited project in Ghaziabad.

Vandfha, Ghaziabad

26th June 2015

Comment

@ Vishal,
According to sources, with the intention of building Metro stations at Rajbagh,Shahidnagar,Shyam Park,Rajender Nagar,Arthala,Mohan Nagar and New Bus Stand land has been obtained and the expense caused was about Rs 45 crore. As per the circle rate, compensation between Rs 50/sq-mt and Rs 68/sq-mt have been paid to different parties by authority.

Veena K,

27th June 2015

@Vishal,
Vijay Yadav, bad habit director, GDA said that Ghaziabad development authority are in converses with Mohan Meakins as well as Durga Enterprises and other private parties for land and it is last stage. According to sources, Development Authority is trying the level best so that land acquisition after the Metro project would be finished shortly.

Ananya,

28th June 2015

@Vishal,

According to most recent news, while asked about NHAI, which had declined to part with a 3.5-km stretch of land at the Mohan Nagar-Meerut Road T-point section, Mr Vijay Yadav said, discussion with the NHAI are under way and the issue will be dealt very shortly. It won't take much time.

Vivek Kulkarni,

29th June 2015

Hey Vishal,

According to me, as of now NHAI has the ownership of 3.5km stretch. However, under a swap settlement, the NHAI was to hand over to the GDA the Mohan Nagar-Meerut Road T-point portion so that Metro construction work could go on without obstacle, and take control from the municipal civic body the 3.6-km-long New Link Road, as of now under construction to connection NH-24 with NH-58.

Vinu S,

30th June 2015

Hey Guys,
I recently heard in news that land acquisition for Ghaziabad Metro is near to completion stage. Kindly discuss about it.

Vishal, Ghaziabad

26th June 2015

Comment

Hi Vishal,
As per my knowledge, The Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) has said the majority of the land acquisition for the Metro expansion project from Dilshad Garden to New Bus Stand has been finished. The GDA said the project does not confront any barriers and a hiccup over the handover of a 3.5-km extend by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) had been dealt with.

Rupal, Ghaziabad

26th June 2015

Hey Guys,
According to current news, in any case, it consented to join the House committee, which would vet the bill, just to ensure that the government did not have a free keep running in the discussions. There was sufficient fury as well as noise from the opposition in the initially meeting called by board of committee chairman SS Ahluwalia a week ago.

Gurmeet,

4th June 2015

Comment

@ Gurmeet,
According to me, congress is implacably opposing to the land acquisition bill of the Modi government. The group has taken the position that the 2013 law went by UPA-II be restored. Trinamool Congress has also opposed the proposition to stop the committee. CPM is truly considering counseling similar parties on leaving house committee.

Bulbul Verma,

5th June 2015

Hi Mr Pranab Malakar,
As per sources, while a smaill section is for forceful action like stopping, the prevailing opinion seems to be that stopping halfway would hand preference to the government. What is the point in leaving without registering our contradiction in the report which would be introduced before the two Houses of Parliament.

Lewin G,

4th June 2015

Comment

Hey Guys,
Why opposition party is against the joint parliamentary committee on land acquisition bill? Kindly discuss.

Pranab Malakar,

4th June 2015

Comment

Hi Pranab,
As per latest news, the opposition party is partitioned more than a proposition to stop the joint parliamentary committee on land acquisition bill, with numerous parties thinking about whether it would fill the need of putting the government under pressure.

Saran,

4th June 2015

@ Pranab,
As I read in news, the choice to repromulgate the ordinance on land acquisition has frustrated the opposition outfits opposed opposition outfit to the land bill, subsequent to the bill was at that point being considered by the joint panel. But the leader of opposition association , congress has varying views within.

Santosh TR,

4th June 2015

Despite the fact, it's very clear that the overall land acquisition under selected projects will not impact more than 0.5% of the cultivable land in India, the activists say that the person who looses the land should get compensation, no matter how much minor they are.

Devesh Kumar, Ahmedabad

26th May 2015

Comment

Right Devesh,
As per Ambedkarites the change bought in by NDA does not look for the agreement of farmers before acquiring their cultivable land, it has attracted a lot of critique not only coming from political circle but also from various agriculture activists where a lot of them had attempted to protest in the city.

Hamsika Iyer, Pune

26th May 2015

Hi Guys,
Have you heard the latest news? All the Ambedkarites in the city too have joined hands to fight the BJP government-driven Land Acquisition Amendment Bill which was recently proposed in Lok Sabha. All their views are seen related to the other key parties all over the nation who have called the proposed amendments anti-farmer and anti-poor.

Ashish Bhoite, Mumbai

26th May 2015

Comment

True Ashish,
Even a farmer told that the Land Acquisition Bill undemocratic. After becoming PM, Narendra Modi has been promoting his Make in India vision very well. But his current action while amending the bill, which mainly aims at promoting foreign companies.

Hamsika Iyer, Pune

26th May 2015

@Hamsika,
It is came to know that the change bought in by NDA does not look for the agreement of farmers before acquiring their cultivable land, it has attracted a lot of critique not only coming from political circle but also from various agriculture activists where a lot of them had attempted to protest in the city.

Ashish Bhoite, Mumbai

26th May 2015

Hmm...........Ashish,
Now, the farmer has made their voice more louder towards the Govt. A farmer leader has told that government can bring in bunch of corporate companies through this bill, but if that is being bought at the cost of all those farmers who may loose their cultivable land, then we are not supporting this bill.

Hamsika Iyer, Pune

26th May 2015

Hi Guys,

I recently came to know from news that, supreme court sustained the land acquisition done by local authorities in Noida & greater noida in year 2006 & 2009. So it may be a relief to residential home buyers but stress to farmers of this area. So all petitions are dismissed in apex court , filed by farmers against land acquisition .

Harilal, Delhi-NCR

14th May 2015

Comment

Yes , I heard that supreme court also sustained an Allahabad High Court order. Earlier Allahabad High court ordered Noida & Greater Noida local authorities to raise the compensation amount by 64.7%
& as well as allow 10% of developed land to farmers.
So farmers started protest & asked to return their land & also they filed many petitions against this land acquisition.

Surinder,

14th May 2015

Hi,

As of now , sustaining land acquisition by Supreme Court , brought huge relief to a lot of property buyers , who have purchased residential apartments in Noida extension , Noida and Greater Noida. But still these property buyers are uncertain about their property future. Nearly 100 residential developments in this area & even some of the developments are in advance stage of construction.

Santosh TR,

14th May 2015

Hi Guys,
Any body notices what happened to land bill in Lok sabha ? I heard there was a very strong protest by opposition party by accusing this bill as anti farmers. Even these opposition party members walkout , shouting slogans & displaying placard in side the house.

James, Delhi

11th May 2015

Comment

Yes James. That's right. This bill was rejected by opposition parties like TMC, BJD & Congress. Honorable speaker Sumitra Mahajan asked for a vote for this bill in Rajya Sabha. And before this voting , Congress , TMC & AAP stages some kind of walk-out in the house.

Right to fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition , Rehabilitation & Resettlement second bill was introduced in the house , after voting by rural affairs minister Birender Singh.

Kalki K,

11th May 2015

Hi Mr Himangi Deshmukh,

As per sources, the choice to convey the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015 to the Lok Sabha was taken in a meeting of the Business Advisory Committee (BAC) on Wednesday.

Gautam Das, Delhi-NCR

8th May 2015

Comment

@ Mr Deshmukh,
According as far as anyone is concerned, the bill was prior cleared by the Lok Sabha on March 10 amid the first 50% of the budget session to supplant an Ordinance which had acquired far reaching changes the ealier land bill brought by the past UPA government in 2013.

Ananya,

9th May 2015

@ Dimangi,
Taking after enormous restriction to the new bill, government couldn't present it in the Rajya Sabha then. To keep the land acquisition Ordinance declared on December 31 last year from passing on April 5, the legislature got it Ordinance re-proclaimed. The re-proclaimed statute conveyed all the nine official alterations that were joined when the bill was gone by the Lok Sabha.

Veena K,

10th May 2015

@ Mr Himangi ,

While the Opposition, mostly Congress, has been stating that the administration ought not make the entry of the charge a distinction issue, the legislature is sharp that the bill turns into a reality however needs to scatter the "opposition to agriculturist" tag, which the Opposition has looked to name it with over the issue. There has been a discussion that the government could recommend alluding the bill to a joint committee of Parliament so as to develop an accord on it.

Vivek Kulkarni,

11th May 2015

Hi Guys,
Recently I heard from news, the bill, which was gone by Lok Sabha in March, couldn't be taken up in the Rajya Sabha taking after which the related Ordinance must be re-proclaimed. Kindly discuss.

Himangi deshmukh, Delhi-NCR

8th May 2015

Comment

Hi Mr Himangi ,

As indicated by sources,the land acquisition bill is being acquired Lok Sabha tomorrow with the administration looking to give another push to the disputable measure notwithstanding not having the numbers in the Rajya Sabha. The bill, which was gone by Lok Sabha in March, couldn't be taken up in the Rajya Sabha taking after which the related Ordinance must be re-declared in the wake of proroguing the Upper House. A duplicate of the re-proclaimed mandate was put in the Lok Sabha on April 20 and in Rajya Sabha on April 23, the opening days of both Houses in the second period of the budget session.

Deep Thakur, Delhi-NCR

8th May 2015

Hi Himangi,
As a feature of the arrangement, government has expanded the session of Lok Sabha by three days today after a meeting of Cabinet Committee on Parliamentary Affairs. Sources in government said that they will make an endeavor to get the bill went in both Houses.

Amit Raj, Delhi-NCR

8th May 2015

Hi Jackie,

As indicated by me, the fundamental inquiry spins around the five classifications of projects being exempted in the new Bill from 70% assent of groups, and from necessity of a Social Impact Assessment, 'in general society interest': projects indispensable to national security; rustic base including charge; moderate lodging and lodging for poor people; mechanical passageways; and framework projects including ones under PPP where the responsibility for keeps on vesting with the legislature.

Bulbul Verma,

27th April 2015

Comment

Hi Guys,

As per sources, some of the key terms could be translated extensively: bringing out national security could include area taken for extending police stations, and terminating reaches; rustic foundation/zap could include coal mines, reasonable lodging could without much of a stretch be extended to mean lodging for the white collar class, taking after the pattern in urban communities of "ventures" in second (more moderate) homes in the inaccessible rural areas; and framework projects can incorporate roadways and turnpikes that may well gone through farmland.

Ananya,

28th April 2015

@ Jackie,
Since the primary commute for changing LARR Act appears to originate from corporate/financial specialist weight to quick track clearances, aren't agriculturists right to be suspicious? The quality of the 2015 Land Bill is its certain dismissal of the pioneer period Land Acquisition Act of 1894, with its idea of overwhelming space. This means the pioneer guarantee that the state has the transcendent right to choose what constitutes 'open intrigue' an expression that has served as escape clause through which a large number of individuals have been uprooted without pay.

Veena K,

29th April 2015

@ Jackie,
As per my knowledge, no less than 50 million individuals including about a quarter of the entire booked tribe populace have been dislodged by huge dams, mines, production lines, terminating extents since Independence, all for the sake of 'advancement'. In the event that the lion's share of uprooting has been of rustic groups, the quantities of poor dislodged in urban areas to clear a path for 'property advancement' is likewise tremendous.

Sujan Mitra,

30th April 2015

Hi Guys,
According to sources, the maximum people dislodged have endured a pivotal decrease in expectations for everyday comforts, and till date have never gotten legitimate remuneration. Jaideep Hardikar's book A Village Awaits Doomsday is only one, human-scale overview of a circumstance influencing a huge number of individuals.

Vivek Kulkarni,

1st May 2015

@ Jackie,

As per different sources & data ,no less than 50 million individuals including about a quarter of the entire planned tribe populace have been uprooted by enormous dams, mines, manufacturing plants, terminating reaches since Independence, all for the sake of 'advancement'. In the event that the lion's share of uprooting has been of provincial groups, the quantities of poor uprooted in urban communities to clear a path for 'property advancement' is likewise tremendous.

Ananya,

2nd May 2015

Hi Guys,

According to sources, the dominant part of individuals dislodged have endured a groundbreaking decrease in expectations for everyday comforts, and till date have never gotten legitimate remuneration.

Most importantly, the voices of dislodged individuals, and of groups undermined with relocation need to be listened. As the PM as of late said, adivasis can make a groundbreaking commitment to the country's improvement. Ranchers' developments against constrained uprooting are not 'hostile to advancement': they offer models of real vote based system and real improvement in light of imparting and protecting nature's abundance.

Bulbul Verma,

3rd May 2015

Hi Guys,

This land bill is becoming a center point of debate & discussion. Some are asking "What is an adapted appearance on the proposed changes to the Land Acquisition Act of 2013" ? Guys kindly share your thoughts & views.

Jackie,

27th April 2015

Comment

Hi Jackie,

According as far as anyone is concerned, one element for the area law (which was re-declared early this month) is the consideration of 13 Acts avoided in the December 2013 draft, including some critical ones, for example, Coal Bearing Areas Act of 1957 and the Atomic Energy Act of 1962. Their prohibition could have made the bill material in a moderately little number of cases.

Kalki K,

27th April 2015

Hi Mr Kunal,

The Lok Sabha will be dismissed sine pass on May 8 while the Rajya Sabha session closes on May 13. Gotten some information about the area bill, he said subsequent to the Ordinance was reissued, it must be reintroduced in the Parliament. The Ordinance must be reissued as now is the right time cutoff had terminated.

Puneet Laskar,

21st April 2015

Comment

As per recent news, Mr Naidu announced the gathering will dispatch a "Mahasampark" battle on May 1 wherein party laborers, MPs, MLAs and chose delegates would be gotten some information about the work done by the Center. "Each individuals will be requested that meet no less than five individuals," Naidu included.

Sujan Mitra,

21st April 2015

Hi Guys,
As per latest news on controversial land bill, this land bill will be taken up in the Lok Sabha towards the end of this Budget Session, which closes on May 8, the legislature on Monday said. The Finance and Railway Bills and the Demand of Grants will be taken up one week from now, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Venkaiah Naidu said.Mr Naidu commented the administration is likewise anticipated that would table the Real Estate Regulatory Bill one month from now.

Kunal,

21st April 2015

Comment

Hi kunal,

In my point of view, the need is the Finance and Railway Bills and the Demand for Grants on the grounds that these must be gone before April 30. The various Bills will be (taken up) one month from now between May 4 and May 8," Naidu told journalists.

Govinda,

21st April 2015

HI Mr Neeraj,

Furthermore, the government is prepared to acknowledge proposals to enhance this law. I generally say that for the benefit of the government. I propose, you need to contradict, restrict, however let the House arrange. Give us a chance to not deter (working of the House), this is just my speak to restriction parties. Then, Leader of Congress in Lok Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge commented that the law will crush the spirits of agriculturists, including that his gathering would contradict it vigorously.

Abhishek,

20th April 2015

Comment

@ Neeraj,

According to sources, this bill will be tabled tomorrow and when it comes up for dialog then every one of us will partake. Under the Article 123 of the Indian Constitution, individuals from my gathering and different gatherings, and I myself have sent a determination and we will restrict the bill with like there's no tomorrow.

Neha Srivastava, Delhi-NCR

21st April 2015

@ Mr Neeraj,

The second 50% of the Budget Session of Parliament, which starts tomorrow, is required to be a stormy undertaking with the government dead set to push through the Land Acquisition Bill and the restriction trying all endeavors to slow down it.

Anwar Mohammed, Delhi-NCR

22nd April 2015

Hi All ,

As indicated by distinctive sources, other than the Land Acquisition Bill, the Parliament is likewise planned to take up other essential bills like the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill, the Goods and Services Tax Bill and the Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets (Imposition of Tax) Bill, additionally called the opposition to dark cash bill.

Praneetha, Delhi-NCR

23rd April 2015

Hi Guys,
As per latest news , Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Honorable M. Venkaiah Naidu on Sunday encouraged the resistance not to misdirect individuals on the Land Acquisition Bill and said the BJP-drove NDA Government at the Center is prepared for a level headed discussion on the matter.

Neeraj Rao,

20th April 2015

Comment

Hi Neeraj,
As per my knowledge, the government is prepared for a civil argument. At the point when the bill will be presented in the Parliament around then everyone will get an opportunity to voice their perspective focuses. We should all planned together.

Vasanth,

20th April 2015

Hi Guys,
The impact of this bill is very clear. Much more improvement in infrastructure will boost real estate market . Once the real estate market will start performing in a well manner , then there will be impressive improvement in India Economy.

Once this bill will work out, employment will be high in India. Not only infrastructure will get boost but also housing sectors will also.

Sujan Mitra,

13th April 2015

Comment

@ Anwar,

The effect of the amendments in the Land Acquisition Bill is relied upon to streamline the procedure of land acquisition so that land therefore procured can be put to great utilization like in the advancement of modern passages along major thruways and interstates. Plus, by shortening the land that can be obtained for mechanical passages to inside 1 km of assigned line lines or streets, the government likewise plans to ensure the hobbies of agriculturists with land past this farthest point, other than giving livelihood to those ranchers why should constrained part with their land.

Joydeep D,

13th April 2015

@ Mr Anwar,

Nonetheless, this revision is prone to have an unfavorable effect on the Smart urban communities proposed to be created along the DMIC (Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor). The evacuation of the substance proviso will straightforwardness land acquisition limitations thereby encouraging the smooth advancement of foundation ventures.

The same is pertinent concerning obtaining of multi-trimmed property. Subsequently the amendments proposed by the government are required to advantage the land area gigantically.

Bulbul Verma,

13th April 2015

Hi Guys,
What are the changes in current land acquisition ordinance ? How it will impact on real estate market ?

Anwar Mohammed, Delhi-NCR

13th April 2015

Comment

Hi Mr Anwar,
As per my knowledge, changes in current land acquisition ordinance are

Land acquisition can be done just for the modern hallways proposed by the govt. The statute achieved before had left a window of vagueness to propose the consideration of undertakings by private players too.

The area obtained for the modern hallway can't surpass 1 km on either side of assigned rail line or street.

Compulsory job for one individual from the influenced ranch worker's family in the undertaking heading up on the area that has been procured from him.

Tamal, Delhi-NCR

13th April 2015

Hi Mr Anwar,

As per sources, other key factors are, Courts can take insight of offense by an administration representative; the mandate had looked for government endorse for indictment of charged. This makes it less demanding for an administration representative beneath the rank of Joint Secretary to be indicted.

Complaints identified with pay can be changed generally.

"Social framework" ventures will exempted from the assent statement and social effect evaluation; the 2013 law had suggested that land could be gained for government ventures and by privately owned businesses when getting 80 every penny assent of ranchers influenced (this is 70 every penny in the event of open private associations).

Pranay Malhotra, Delhi-NCR

13th April 2015

According to me, some changes in ordinance are,
Drop in prior recommendation that obliged the legislature to procure land for private instructive organizations and healing facilities.

Removal of bottlenecks for industry acquisition of multi-cropped property.

Preeti Kher, Delhi-NCR

13th April 2015

Hi Guys,

According to late news, in a fantastic show of solidarity against the land Bill, individuals from Parliament (MPs) from Opposition gatherings, drove by Congress President Sonia Gandhi, on weekday took out a walk to Rashtrapati Bhavan from Parliament. Presenting a note to President Pranab Mukherjee, Opposition pioneers promised to unfold the battle against the opposition to rancher enactment to every town inside the nation.

Abhishek,

18th March 2015

Comment

Hi,

According to congress president, we(party) tend to contradict the Modi government on the area Bill and are resolved to annihilation its styles... we tend to demand the President to mediate and raise the Modi government to not act with area Bill inside the Rajya Sabha.

Vasanth,

18th March 2015

While the govt. had figured out how to regulate the Bill a smooth entry inside the Lok Sabha, wherever its in an exceptionally lion's share, the higher House has disturbed its plans. Since Opposition gatherings had effectively made open their call to walk to the President's home, trouble began generation when Rajya Sabha MPs showed letters from city Police expressing Section 144 of the CrPC had been compulsory that guided them to not act with the walk.

Neeraj Rao,

18th March 2015

As indicated by me, sensing the bellicosity inside the Opposition positions, the govt. debilitated numerous scores and justified irate Rajya Sabha MPs that the precaution requests had been uprooted; they were acquit to walk down Raisina Hill.

Rubiya,

18th March 2015

According to news, in the wake of presenting a note to President Mukherjee Sonia Gandhi self-tended to the media, emphasizing their (Opposition) expectation to contradict the area bill. "We ask the govt. to not furrow ahead with the bill furthermore the corrections inside the Rajya Sabha," she said. in an exceptionally frontal assault on the govt. she same, "All indecent, equitable and creative strengths are dead set to annihilation the Modi government's styles to push divisions and in-congruity.

rahul kirmani, Delhi

20th March 2015

I came to know from news that, according to senior pioneer of JD(U) Sharad Yadav , We got 69 % of the vote in the 2014 survey and the Modi sarkar got just 31 %. Promising to spread the challenges across the country, Yadav portrayed the bill as an area grabbing mandate and repeated they would restrict it both inside and outside Parliament .

Jeet Bhaskar, Delhi

21st March 2015

According to sources, the Congress has requested that the administration ought to bring back its year 2013 enactment and is no temperament to permit any alterations. The gathering had as of now been dissenting countrywide against this new bill, with its gathering MPs and Youth Congress specialists challenging at Jantar Mantar yesterday. The gathering sees in the area charge a chance to revive itself. It was gathering Vice President Rahul Gandhi who had driven begun the battle for the UPA's property bill from Bhatta Parsaul.

Anwar Mohammed, Delhi-NCR

22nd March 2015

Well Amit, in the meantime, by diminishing the land that can be acquired for mechanical hallways to inside 1 km of assigned track lines or streets, the administration additionally expects to secure the hobbies of ranchers with land past this point of confinement, other than giving vocation to those agriculturists why should constrained part with their land.

Shailja, Delhi-NCR

16th March 2015

Comment

Hi Sailja,
In my perspective, the effect of the revisions in the Land Acquisition Bill is relied upon to streamline the procedure of land securing so that land in this manner obtained can be put to great utilization like in the advancement of mechanical halls along major thruways and roads.

Amit Raj, Delhi-NCR

16th March 2015

Comment

Hi everybody,

Finally the most disputable Land Acquisition Bill was gone in Lok Sabha on March 10th, 2015, with upwards of 9 alterations made to the law established by the UPA government in 2013. A hefty portion of the changes proposed were of greatest importance while others were dubious. Be that as it may, the administration would confront a hard errand to get the Bill went in Rajya Sabha where it does not have a dominant part.

Shailja, Delhi-NCR

16th March 2015

Comment

Hi Sunil,

According to sources, it is additionally specified that where the influenced families having a place with the SC and the ST are migrated outside of the area then they should be paid an extra 25 restoration and resettlement advantages to which they are make qualified in fiscal terms alongside an one-time privilege of Rs.50000.

Sunil Sharma, Noida

15th March 2015

Comment

Aside from that installment of pay that is dependent upon 4 times the business esteem in country ranges and 2 times the business sector esteem in urban regions.

Nobody should be disposses until and unless all installments are made and option destinations for the resettlement and recovery have been arranged.

In situations where PPP projects are included or procurement is occurring for privately owned businesses, the Bill requires the understanding of no under 70% and 80% individually of those whose land is look to be gained.

Sunil Kulkarni, Pune

14th March 2015

Comment

Hi,
Here are the real features of land acquisition bill:-

1) No pay charge should be required and no stamp obligation might be charged on any sum that gathers to a single person as a consequence of the procurement of the new law.

2) Compensation to the individuals who are reliant on the land being gained for their occupation.

3) No law can be obtained in Scheduled Areas without the assent of the Gram Sabhas.

Dwarkesh,

13th March 2015

Comment

Hi Mr tushar,

According as far as anyone is concerned, the progressions that the govt has arranged search for to incorporate those trained by distinctive gatherings. Among them are revisions to affirm a much better instrument for the redressal of grievances of these whose land is non-inheritable . It has additionally wanted to expel social base projects from a rundown of classifications that the administration needs exempted from obliging the assent of 70% ranchers in a zone where land will be gained. The current law needs that assent for all projects.

Rajesh, Delhi-NCR

12th March 2015

Comment

@ Tushar,

It has additionally consented to restore a social effect appraisal just for social foundation projects. The Opposition and government associates like the Akali Dal have griped against the administration's turn to scrap the social effect evaluation provision, required in the current law, for five classifications.

Lokesh Patwa,

12th March 2015

@ Mr Tushar,

According to sources, the Narendra Modi government's propounded land changes have been censured as "master corporates" and "against agriculturists" by the resistance and activists. Numerous key associates have additionally cautioned that they will think that it hard to bolster it without changes.

Diwakar Shetty,

12th March 2015

@ Mr Tushar,

Partner Shiv Sena has kept the BJP government, that it is a part of, on tenterhooks, demanding Monday evening that it has not chose which way it will vote on the Land Acquisition Bill in the Lok Sabha today. While the BJP is not stressed over numbers in the Lower House, it has practically the whole restriction went against the enactment and will battle to pass it in the Rajya Sabha, where it is in a minority. The Congress has said it will bolster no progressions to the law its administration got 2013.

Dwarkesh,

12th March 2015

@ Tushar Sinha,

According as far as anyone is concerned, the Modi government hosts came to aim on gatherings simply like the Biju Janata dal for help. Power and coal minister Piyush Goyal met Odisha Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik in Delhi on Mon. On Monday, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee met Prime Minister Narendra Modi to chase fiscal assistance from the Center for her flat out broke state in the midst of theory that the PM would utilize it as partner degree ice-breaker. Ms Banerjee commanded out the backing of her Trinamool Congress for the land bill.

lekshmi.sanjeev@ymail.com, Delhi

13th March 2015

@ Mr Tushar,

The legislature / govt. says the projected land changes adjust the benefits of agriculturists with the squeezing got the opportunity to offer land for projects value worth innumerable dollars . It had been presented in December month as partner degree law or declaration which has the capacity slip on the off chance that its not affirmed by this session of Parliament.

Vinu S,

14th March 2015

Hi Mr Tushar,

According as far as anyone is concerned, communicating the personality of his administration to mull over the fifty two changes enthusiastic by individuals, Naidu trusted that Rural Development Minister Birender Singh can investigate the probability of decreasing the land for mechanical halls being wanted to zest up delivering area inside the nation.

Subho Mallik, Delhi

10th March 2015

Comment

Hi Tushar,

According to sources,Honorable minister Naidu conjointly recommended making a "bank" of desolate land for securing and previously stated 1st such land should be utilized for putting as a part of spot of business comes. the govt. has got the opportunity to ensure employments for the individuals from the dislodged families, he said, including "there may additionally be a bother free grievance redressal system" to manage issues with respect to recovery.

lekshmi.sanjeev@ymail.com, Delhi

11th March 2015

@ Mr Tushar,

As indicated by me, another change may identify with getting rid of moving the state preeminent court for advances against land securing. people will right now approach powers inside the region 1st for redressal. At present, the need of leading a social effect evaluation and breaking points on multi-edited land is additionally waived by the govt., for safeguard, provincial foundation and also charge, reasonable lodging, modern halls, and framework and social base comes.

Ankita, Delhi

12th March 2015

Hi Tushar,

According to me, the authority changes may get rid of exclusion to social framework comes in surgical methodology mode to calm the restriction and NGOs. Naidu looked for after to shield the evacuation of the five-year top for the fruition of a project on noninheritable land, talked correspondence that it takes years to build up a project. "We don't wish India to be a country of deficient projects.

James, Delhi

13th March 2015

@ Tushar,

According to sources, amid the discussion, a few individuals contradicted the bill with some even hard that the govt send it to the division related panel. They conjointly asked the govt to not get rid of the assent provision, sway appraisal of procurement and assume control of flooded land. Toughening its stand, Congress these days set to vote against the bill in Lok Sabha tomorrow if government doesn't withdraw changes or declines to send it to the panel.

Rakhi Bansal, Delhi

14th March 2015

Hi Guys,
According to news, party President Sonia Gandhi led 2 gatherings of the Parliamentary Affairs Committee of the gathering and each one its forty four Lok Sabha MPs to level headed discussion the system over the bill, whose 2013 variant was the motivation of gathering VP Rahul Gandhi. BJP's collusion accomplice in NDA, the Shiv Sena unbroken the govt on tenterhooks by oral correspondence its not accepted any approach supporting the enactment or something else.

Neha Srivastava, Delhi-NCR

15th March 2015

Hi Mr Tushar Sinha,
Confronted with hardened restriction, the Modi government is prepared to move at least about six alterations to the Land Bill inside the Lok Sabha tomorrow, together with the one connected with constraining land for modern passages and setting up spot a bother free system for grievance redressal.

Rajesh, Delhi-NCR

10th March 2015

Comment

@ Tushar,

According to diverse sources, Government is willing to travel certain change inside the (land) bill inside the bigger enthusiasm of the group and consequently the nation," Parliamentary Affairs Minister Mr Venkaiah Naidu previously stated in Lok Sabha while mediating inside the dialog on the bill to trade the right to truthful Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and transportation (Amendment) Ordinance.

Raj Roy, Delhi

10th March 2015

Hi Tushar,

His(Mr Naidu) intervention came in the midst of strong restriction to the bill whilst Congress and a couple of distinctive gatherings requested that or not its named a parliamentary board for frayed examination. Then, sources inside the legislature same at least six authority corrections will be passionate tomorrow that the Lok Sabha secretariat has as of now been approached.

Sujan Mitra,

10th March 2015