ukn esperanza review

Q: I visited their other sites and spoke to the marketing people, owners and visited the site to see the construction quality. Pros and cons are as follows:

1. marketing people are nice, I was interacting with a lady by name puja and also talked to one more person by name nihar.

2. despite being a tier-3 builder, they provide wall mounted commodes unlike a lot of other tier-3 builders. but the door and window handles are dirt cheap quality aluminium that you can bend and destroy.

2. the commends from ownerukn in this thread are actually true... I also found that you are forced into agreements that the builder will maintain the property for 10 years. they are mimicking the model followed by some tier 1 builders like total environment but the difference with TE is the money is collected up-front for prop maint (and inflation of 7% is considered). with ukn, the charges are hiked every year by 10% every year and cost of DG fuel, water etc. is over and above it.

3. dec 2014 is the promised date for delivering phase 2 in esperanza, and the progress suggests that will not happen. It seems they charge all the money by promising what is on paper (e.g. flooring) but leave most work necessary to move in and the actual completion happens after an year.

4. during the recent sand crisis, they started using mud and husk mixture materials to make progress on construction in various projects like miraya near shell, the issues with that will come up only after three or four years.

i decided to go for other builder, there are too many risks with these people.