Rs , sq ft

Removed from Shortlist

My Shortlist ()
Keep track of your shortlisted properties here. Shortlist a property to get started.

Real Estate Forum on Delhi High Court

Real Estate Property Discussion Forum and Guide to Real Estate Queries

Filter On:


View Discussion from the month of
Q: Hi all,
Just wondering if any owners here have received notification from IREO of the changes in transfer rules recently. They plan to allow transfers only till July end, post which the transfer charges are being unilaterally revised to a draconian 500 per sq ft for towers A and B! I would like to solicit views on whether such amendments are legal at all? Are builders allowed to set arbitrary transfer charges for under construction properties?
Latest Answer: Possession of the apartments has been offered now, with extra demand beyond Buyer's Agreement as follows: 1- About Rs. 5 lacs hidden and unexplained taxes etc, 2- Exorbitant compulsory club membership fees of Rs.5.75 lacs, limited for 20 yrs 3- Interest on advance payments according to scheme not adjusted in the demand note 4- No response to emails for explanation of above extra charges etc, leaving allotees furious but helpless 5- Buyer's Agreement signed by allotee covers Ireo to good enough to blackmail and force allottees to pay all above under the pressure of penalties and further loss, while Ireo using the tactics of time consuming by lack of response 6- Not allowing allottees to see their own apartment before all the demanded money is paid, so that they do not get chance to complain about quality of the apartment as compared to what was promised via videos/catalogs assuring so called "Modern Age Living" etc, which as reported by some is not even close to that in reality
Reply


Q: In spite of the fact that interest at higher rate is charged from consumer for delay and minimal interest is payable by the builder by his own delay.
Latest Answer: This is a cheating and criminal breach. Matter has not been solved yet and Aggarwal alleged that he also filed a complaint before State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission where a settlement was arrived at, as per which a plot measuring 335 sq-yrd was agreed to be given on further payment of Rs 22.23 lakh.
Reply


Q: On 27.01.2016, Delhi high court ruled that a flat owner can park only one vehicle in a assigned slot inside the complex.
Latest Answer: Welcome move by Delhi High Court Sekhar......It is a clear cut message to those who own multiple cars without ensuring sufficient parking space. This is nothing but show off. Purchase of private vehicles must be guided by need not greed.
Reply


Q: Hi, i heard that there is petition in court against the corporations redevelopment plans in the area.
Latest Answer: Well it seems that there is no green belt planned and the redevelopment is at the cost of burdening the roads and existing infrastructure. the residents cannot enter the colonies and over 3 lakh sqft of commercial space is being constructed in such a congested and saturated area.
Reply


Q: I heard about the refunding of extra floor area ratio to institutions- discuss!!

Latest Answer: Guess these institutions took a wise move and decide to approach court when DDA send notification to then in 2008 enhancing the additional FAR charges on the land allotted to them.
Reply


Also see discussions for
Show More
Ask a Question
120 Characters Left

    Ask a Question
    120 Characters Left





      Trending Categories








      CommonFloor Property Search Mobile App now available on Android, iOS and Windows!