Q:We would like to clarify that the comment of Narasimha Dev claiming the builder has a lot of litigation cases in their properties is false, frivolous and far from truth. Infact, the same is defamatory comment. The said Narasimha Dev without ascertaining the real facts made a defamatory comment. We would like to clarify in the following comments:The issue of litigation in respect of Raja Aristos as detailed below:One Annapoorna Prasad sister of Land Owner Sri.M.R.Ramaprasad filed a false, frivolous and vexatious litigation claiming partition in respect of the property in question. According to us, the said litigation is false and vexatious. We come to the conclusion on the basis that the said Smt.Annapoorna Prasad having released/relinquished her right, title and interest in respect of the property in question in favour of her brother Sri.M.R.Ramaprasad, which document was confirmed by a Registered Confirmation Deed. After four years from the date of execution of the aforesaid two documents, just to blackmail and harass the Land Owners filed a vexatious suit.
Q:The Trial Court in O.S.No.186/2013 before going for a trial, rejected the plaint filed by Smt. Annapoorna Prasad. Against the said Order, Smt. Annapoorna Prasad filed RFA No.215/2015. In the said RFA, the Hon’ble High Court in Page No.18(ref RFA-215/2015 posted by Mr. Narasimhadev) made it very clear that the Builder, i.e., we, Raja Housing Ltd., is not a necessary party. However, the Court allowed RFA filed by Smt. Annapoorna Prasad. Mr.Narasimha Dev without going into the real facts has wrongly commented that we have filed an appeal which is again false one
Q:We would like to clarify the general public that against the said Order in RFA No.215/2015, we along with the Land Owners filed SLP in No.21115/2015 before the Supreme Court of India. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India after having considered our appeal, prima facie felt that the Order passed by the Hon’ble High Court in RFA No.215/2015 requires to be stayed and as such granted Interim Order vide its Order, dt: 03-08-2015. The Hon’ble Supreme Court passed the following OrderIssue notice by speed post, returnable on 21st September, 2015Implementation of the impugned judgment is stayed until further ordersThe judgment in RFA No.215/2015 allowing the appeal filed by Smt.Annapoorna Prasad is stayed and as such the Order of the Trial Court in O.S.No.186/2013 rejecting the plaint stands as it is as on date, which clearly clarifies that there is no suit pending as on date in respect of the property.
Q:We have decided to take appropriate action in consultation with our legal team against the person/s who is/are posting false/defamatory statements against our company.We request the persons who comment should know the facts before commenting and giving reviews. The persons who comment/review should not comment/give reviews without knowing the factual points or suppressing the real facts.THE COPY OF ORDER DATED 03.08.2015 IN SLP NO.21115/2015 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ALSO HAS BEEN UPLOADED FOR YOUR KIND REFERENCE.Ajay Kumar. NManager-LegalM/s. Raja Housing Ltd.,
Q:The issue of litigation in respect of Raja Aristos as detailed below:One Annapoorna Prasad sister of Land Owner Sri.M.R.Ramaprasad filed a false, frivolous and vexatious litigation claiming partition in respect of the property in question. According to us, the said litigation is false and vexatious. We come to the conclusion on the basis that the said Smt.Annapoorna Prasad having released/relinquished her right, title and interest in respect of the property in question in favour of her brother Sri.M.R.Ramaprasad, which document was confirmed by a Registered Confirmation Deed. After four years from the date of execution of the aforesaid two documents, just to blackmail and harass the Land Owners filed a vexatious suit.
Latest Answer: The Trial Court in O.S.No.186/2013 before going for a trial, rejected the plaint filed by Smt. Annapoorna Prasad. Against the said Order, Smt. Annapoorna Prasad filed RFA No.215/2015. In the said RFA, the Hon’ble High Court in Page No.18(ref RFA-215/2015 posted by Mr. Narasimhadev) made it very clear that the Builder, i.e., we, Raja Housing Ltd., is not a necessary party. However, the Court allowed RFA filed by Smt. Annapoorna Prasad. Mr.Narasimha Dev without going into the real facts has wrongly commented that we have filed an appeal which is again false one.
Q:I am thinking of buying a flat in Raja Aristos. Is there anything that I need to be aware about? Any idea on the best per square foot pricing in this area? Also any idea if the builder has paid the betterment fees? Thanks.
