I spoke to the marketing folks and the most irritating fact is that they claim Meadows II owners have no say and have to just accept what builder/Meadows-I association does. That is outrageous. It is our hard-earned money that is put in and we need to have a say in what is being done. After some heated discussions, the marketing person evaded legal questions and said I can talk to their lawyer. I think we need to have a group of Meadows II owners to have collective representation not just for this but for any future decisions. I've created a facebook group for the same ( Nagarjuna Meadows II ) . Meadows II owners, please join so that we can have collective representation.I spoke to the marketing folks and the most irritating fact is that they claim Meadows II owners have no say and have to just accept what builder/Meadows-I association does. That is outrageous. It is our hard-earned money that is put in and we need to have a say in what is being done. After some heated discussions, the marketing person evaded legal questions and said I can talk to their lawyer. I think we need to have a group of Meadows II owners to have collective representation not just for this but for any future decisions. I've created a facebook group for the same ( Nagarjuna Meadows II ) . Meadows II owners, please join so that we can have collective representation.

Dear Mr.Kameshwar - Thanks for bring about facts from other side of the coin. I am certainly open for exploring possibilities but my main concern is that Meadows II owners are kept outside this whole process. Meadows II owners should clearly know what we gain/lose out of this and if it is worthwhile doing it. I have been voicing certain concerns to NCCUIL with respect to merging and I want those to be addressed clearly. It is quite difficult to just sit back and assume other parties ( NCCUIL/Meadows I owners ) will take care of all our concerns. The last thing we would want is a badly merged complex creating more troubles than any use for both Meadows II and Meadows I . If that happens going back as independent complexes would be at the expense of lot of bitterness among residents and would be much better we remain independent from day-1.Dear Mr.Kameshwar - Thanks for bring about facts from other side of the coin. I am certainly open for exploring possibilities but my main concern is that Meadows II owners are kept outside this whole process. Meadows II owners should clearly know what we gain/lose out of this and if it is worthwhile doing it. I have been voicing certain concerns to NCCUIL with respect to merging and I want those to be addressed clearly. It is quite difficult to just sit back and assume other parties ( NCCUIL/Meadows I owners ) will take care of all our concerns. The last thing we would want is a badly merged complex creating more troubles than any use for both Meadows II and Meadows I . If that happens going back as independent complexes would be at the expense of lot of bitterness among residents and would be much better we remain independent from day-1.