Kameshwar Chesetti
Q: Hello Prospective Buyers of Meadows II,- There is a move to merge Meadows (old project) with Meadows II (new Project ) which NCCUIL is proposing and this is legally not feasible. In such an eventuality, your new common facilities like swimming pool, club house etc could be shared by residents of 318 apartments of old project, thus diluting the maintenance apart from fair wear and tear.I am sure that logically no prospective buyers of new project would wish to share their assets with another alien project .Incidentally, both are two independent projects having separate approvals from statutory authorities, registered sale deeds and DOD also specify separate common areas, common assets etc. Also is it not logical to merge a 4 yrs old project with a new project ?. Prospective owners of Meadows II need to ponder to arrive at a logical conclusion.

My replies to this discussion
Dear Mr Nitin and Mr Ramakrishnan, I am a resident of Phase I and we have our own facilities which we hardly use - we are not out to spoil your brand new facilities. The intent was only to have a social relationship with Phase I - we have our own facilities, the common area per resident of ours is more, we are well to do educated people with character - why would we simply want to rob or steal your facilities ? Average resident wants a peaceful life. Commander Babu is just out to poison your minds just like he is badmouthing Phase II people among Phase I. People who talk bad behind backs can do that for anyone. We have never said merger, but there is value in association. You can discuss with the residents of Phase I and if you still think we are bad people then I will keep quiet. I am sending this email with some fear because Mr Babu's poison will be directed at me now. God bless !! Regards Kameshwar Rao (Resident of NCC Meadows Phase I)Dear Mr Nitin and Mr Ramakrishnan, I am a resident of Phase I and we have our own facilities which we hardly use - we are not out to spoil your brand new facilities. The intent was only to have a social relationship with Phase I - we have our own facilities, the common area per resident of ours is more, we are well to do educated people with character - why would we simply want to rob or steal your facilities ? Average resident wants a peaceful life. Commander Babu is just out to poison your minds just like he is badmouthing Phase II people among Phase I. People who talk bad behind backs can do that for anyone. We have never said merger, but there is value in association. You can discuss with the residents of Phase I and if you still think we are bad people then I will keep quiet. I am sending this email with some fear because Mr Babu's poison will be directed at me now. God bless !! Regards Kameshwar Rao (Resident of NCC Meadows Phase I)
Dear Mr Nitin and Mr Ramakrishnan, Further to my appeal to consider all sides of the issue, here are some of my thoughts. The whole issue arose because NCCUIL kept the issue hanging of whether these are two separate projects or separate phases. The two areas are contiguous, buildings look similar, they are named in sequence ours is A-D and yours are start from H. But since the DoD of phase I is in place it can't be changed. So we are not even talking of changing the DoD because that would require 100% agreement of owners of both sides. So, please don't be misled that your DoD is being changed behind your back. So, what exactly is this merger ? The exact shape is still being debated. It could be sharing of facilities and management, there are possible economies of scale, social interaction, festivals etc. Because of the ambiguous nature of these two projects even the solution is more to do with coming to an understanding than a legal issue. Regards Kameshwar Rao C (Owner Phase 1)Dear Mr Nitin and Mr Ramakrishnan, Further to my appeal to consider all sides of the issue, here are some of my thoughts. The whole issue arose because NCCUIL kept the issue hanging of whether these are two separate projects or separate phases. The two areas are contiguous, buildings look similar, they are named in sequence ours is A-D and yours are start from H. But since the DoD of phase I is in place it can't be changed. So we are not even talking of changing the DoD because that would require 100% agreement of owners of both sides. So, please don't be misled that your DoD is being changed behind your back. So, what exactly is this merger ? The exact shape is still being debated. It could be sharing of facilities and management, there are possible economies of scale, social interaction, festivals etc. Because of the ambiguous nature of these two projects even the solution is more to do with coming to an understanding than a legal issue. Regards Kameshwar Rao C (Owner Phase 1)
My comments to replies
Mr Kameshwar - please do not misguide the owners of Meadows II. First you seem to be either ignorant or choose to ignore about developments in our Meadows. I too bought the apartment to enjoy peaceful living in a small and self contained complex which is being threatened. Why should I poison them and what do I gain. Please be honest and upright to put facts and figures. Certainly, a well educated person would have to answer following- a) Why was MC forced to conduct 2 interactive meetings and what for? b)What does the sub committee report say. c) What is the meaning of Mr puspendra statement in Adda which I quote' Bigger Club house' indoor badminton court' cricket pitch etc- Is it for watching with thumb sucking ? Incidentally, both gentlemen of Meadows II along with few other are in regular touch with me and you are not aware how Marketing office has duped them. Yes I take head on with those who cheat or indulge in illegality. If you are honest / upright then why have fear.
Mr Babu, Its well known that you are a proponent of small communities with high walls, no children and no festivities - thats your preference, I respect that. Whether MC was forced or not is again your opinion - MC called the meetings to get resident views and disseminate information. All I am saying is let the residents of Phase II get other viewpoints also and come to their decisions - instead of you biasing them by pretending to be a crusader. One of recommendations could be that Phase I residents will not access 'Bigger clubhouse', I am fine with that. Kameshwar Rao
12th March 2014

Ask a Question
120 Characters Left





    Trending Categories

    CommonFloor Property Search Mobile App now available on Android, iOS and Windows!